:unsure: seems like a nightmare, those are some awful candies.

Muskgrove, I must not have been paying attention. I didn't realize you were a fellow SEER, nice to know you.

The reason I'm writing is to see if you could, If any of you could answer another question for me.

I saw a site some time back that commented on the fact that one of Mrs. Huisentruit's acquantences had a son a teen or young adult that was draw to her, had a crush on her, boardering on near obsession. I've tried going back and looking for that site, but it's a headache. Who was this young man?

If this story was apart of a website back then, then it had to have been something the police had looked at and thought something of it. does anyone remember who this young man was and whom he was related to that JODI knew.

Thanks for the help, that definately mede me remember where I was when I read that. I'm going to go back and read it more closer because i'm sure she made some mentions about TRENT giving her the CREEPS. If it was something worth mentioning in her DIARY, if that is were I read it, then it merrits a closer look.

A teen or young adult would more than likely have to DRAG JODI (i.e. the DRAG MARKS) due to the lack of strength. I understand from much of the video News footage that Mrs. Huisentruit was very petit, which would not require much body strength to lift her.

Thanks again for the help, I wish I knew a bit more about HIS PAST and PAST ASSOCIATES (friends).

Thanks.

Trent was not a young teen at this point, and would not needed to have 'dragged' anything. And should not be included in posted theories. Sins of the father should not be the curse of their children. Trenton may have been a victim himself, and, no, there is nothing in the Bednar book that points to him as being 'creepy' to Jodi!

I think there is alot of focus on the persons of interest highlighted in the book "Dead Air".

My question to some who have seemingly "convicted" one or more odd said persons is this: If there was sufficient evidence to bring any of these people before a grand jury, wouldn't this have already been done? And if not, doesn't this lead us to the conclusion that the evidence against these people is simply not there?

No matter how "creepy" certain persons are, does not necessarlily translate into a creepy murderous person. In my opinion, focusing solely on the persons highlighted in the book leaves out searching for other suspects. This crime may have been one of opportunity and the person involved unknown to Jodi.

If I was a police investigator, I would be looking at the makeup of people living within an x mile radius of Jodi. Were there any known sex offenders living in proximity at this time?

There's been alot made of Jodi calling out a name. Ideally, it would be a smoking gun, but at this point I think its a dead end. Did she say Don, Ron, Hon, Bon? Or in her moment of terror, was Jodi just crying out for someone she thought could help her. And if the name was known, what would it prove as evidence without a third witness who could verify that YES it was Don or Ron standing there? Plus I would have to question the name witness as to physically where they were when they heard the name uttered. Were they 10 feet away or 500 feet away? Were there walls between?

Hard evidence is going to solve this case. I still believe the name of the killer has not been uttered in print. Investigators and those wanting justice for Jody should redirect focus on WHO was living in the Mason City area at the time of the abduction. Persons with sex offender backgrounds. Persons with a history of obsessive stalking. It is likely that Jodi's killer is still alive and has probably raped or killed again since the crime. For example, person x living in the 90's in Mason City. Person x with an arrest record for stalking and sexual offenses. Person x arrested in another state since Jodi's murder. Investigators question person x concerning their life while living in Mason City. Not easy work and slim prospects, but with a case this cold maybe the only plausible option left.

Without a third visual witness to the person at Jodi's door the night before, its now a dead end. Besides, even there was such a witness, it wouldn't prove this person was the killer.

In the book, the woman jogger saw two cars leave the key apartments. One was a little car and the second was a dark, shiny and nice- the jogger stated too nice for someone who lived at the Key apartments. But they never say in the book what kind of car Vancise drove, besides his work van. And what about the guy her gave her the mazda and she dated a few times. What kind of car did he drive at that time after he gave her is miata?

tak24 said
Muskgrove, I must not have been paying attention. I didn't realize you were a fellow SEER, nice to know you.

The reason I'm writing is to see if you could, If any of you could answer another question for me.

I saw a site some time back that commented on the fact that one of Mrs. Huisentruit's acquantences had a son a teen or young adult that was draw to her, had a crush on her, boardering on near obsession. I've tried going back and looking for that site, but it's a headache. Who was this young man?

If this story was apart of a website back then, then it had to have been something the police had looked at and thought something of it. does anyone remember who this young man was and whom he was related to that JODI knew.

he was cornseed's son.