Amy Kuuns is of no help. She isn't coming forward because she fears that it will hurt her career and credibility as a professional. Making false allegations could do so. I doubt she knows much so it probably isn't worth trying to squeeze blood from a turnip.

Amy Kuns has moved on, and I think we need to move on from Amy's quotes. I very well bet she will never EVER speak publicly about Jodi ever again.

One thing too is that it seems that everyone is afraid of making false allegations (including Josh and Gary). They seem dedicated to solving the crime, but they don't provide a lot of feedback here on the forums it seems maybe for that reason.

Who out there is able to file a defamation suit? Van Sice? or maybe someone else out there who hasn't even been mentioned here. Who knows?

There are several of her friends and neighbors who have lived with the guilt of "what if's". "What if" they had called the police or done this or that. After almost 15 years of carring that with them I am sure Jodi forgave them a long time ago.

We are not all powerful and surely not in control of the Universe. We just try and ponder possibilities and hope for a resolution.

I don't blame Amy for not calling police sooner after Jodi failed to show up to work, particularly since Jodi had a history of being late. That has never been an issue to me. Even if she had called police 20 minutes later, Jodi was long gone.

That's how I see it, sixtiesrock. I think Amy or another employee would have been concerned much sooner and called police had Jodi was punctual.

Jodi's mom has stated in the past, that she was NEVER late for work?! :huh:

After reading all the stuff written here I would like to hear who y'all think comitted this murder. I know this would not be possible but would be interesting!!!!!

which is more effective: lie detector test.:unsure: or, water-boarding?:woohoo:

either may produce false results.

You really think they have a good idea who did it? I don't think so. I think that they messed this whole investagation up and really have nothing. As far as Mr. cornseed man goes I really doubt that he knows anything. I understand he did take a lie dector test and past it. I do know that they are pretty acurate. It would be interesting to know how many of her fellow workers would come forward and take one. Somebody there knew more than they are letting on. Does anybody else know if any others have taken a lie dector test?

We need to know if the police conducted this polygraph or was it arranged privately by the cornseed dude. If it was the latter, then why is the question.
We all know polygraph test results are not admissible as evidence in a court of law.
There must be a reason for this.

It is claimed America's worst serial killer passed a polygraph administered by police. This led to many more deaths.

Perhaps the interpretations of the polygraph results are improving but in many people's opinion it is an inexact science.

Crimgen, please re-read my post. I did not say lie detector tests are admissable in court. I was responding to a quote from Colby and said that even if cornseed guy passed a lie detector test, they are NOT admissable in court.

Having said that, I agree, and always have agreed, that cornseed guy is involved in Jodi's disappearance. He was the last person to see her, he wanted more out of the relationship than she wanted, and he left town rather than join the search for her. He was clearly obsessed with her, naming his boat after her. He even stalked her at one point. I would like to know if LE searched cornseed guy's house and vehicles, whether he had an alibi, and could account for his whereabouts. I heard, and I don't know if it's fact, that a woman he regularly took walks with at that hour said he was late that morning Jodi had disappeared. If true, then where was he? What is his alibi? If LE didn't conduct a search in cornseed guy's house or in his vehicles within 24 hours, or at any time, then you know why this case has gone cold.